Date

Attendees



Agenda

Minutes

  • AT&T tests
    • Rudra & SK: no follow up items
    • SK: do we want to have this tests as sanity or weekly tests, +1 from sukhdev
    • SK: ownership for these tests, will provide support where needed
    • Rudra: alex pointed out difference in framework
    • Rudra: this needs to be compared to what already exists in Juniper testing
    • Alex: CI runs different framework, Zuul. If Shaker tests needs to run outside the CI, it is possible to accommodate
    • Alex: Shaker runs tests with heat templates
    • Alex: Tungsten Fabric should use one framework for testing
    • Sukhdev: Rudra should take ownership of Shaker Tests, whether it is easy to run in AT&T labs
  • Talk on Service Chaining
    • TF supports three type of service chaining transparent, in-network and in-network-nat
    • Service chaining in container and VMs is similar and configured in same way
  • Prabhjot: will followup pending reviews on email thread


Action items

  • Prabhjot Singh Sethiupdate dev email list about CNI DPDK support and moving vhost support from contrail-vrouter to dpdk-vrouter
  • Rudra Dubey to get back with recommendation on how community can utilise Shaker test contributed by AT&T
  •