Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:18:44 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1089595934.3341.1711653524746@aws-us-west-2-tungsten-confluence-1.web.codeaurora.org>
Subject: Exported From Confluence
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="----=_Part_3340_2079655774.1711653524746"
------=_Part_3340_2079655774.1711653524746
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
2019-06-04 Technical Work Stream
2019-06-04 Technical Work Stream
Date
Attendees
Agenda
- Start the Recording
- Antitrust Policy
- Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)
- VSPERF integration (Prabhjot)
- need to have a baseline configuration to be used for Vrouter (preferabl=
y Juniper needs to review)
- clarification on flows from the last TSC call.
- Community Repos (Prabhjot)
- need to identify repos that are not used by Juniper's commercial (Contr=
ail) Product/distribution
- to begin with we will need to have some reviewers external to Juniper o=
n these repos, to kick start the community contributions
- Source build procedure and tagging of RPMs at TPC http://148.25=
1.5.90/tpc/ (Prabhjot)
- RLB: List of code reviewers? (Juniper and non-Juniper)
- RLB: What's the scope of the technical workstream call and how does it =
avoid overlap with the TSC call?
- General Topics
Minutes
- VSPERF
- None of those folks are on this call this week
- PS: Will need a review from someone at Juniper for this stuff
- Does the config make sense? They may be in a good position to judge thi=
s.
- JG: Going through last hoops of Intel legal approval to share perf doc =
w/the Docs team
- JG would like to create a WG to work through perf bottlenecks
- Forked DPDK in TF
- Affects VSPERF, per Sridar from 2019-05-28 Meeting notes
- Currently builds from a cloned DPDK
- Would like some background on how/why this is forked
- So they're not building against a moving target
- Appears to be a bad habit
- Should build against a specific tag
- Worth prototyping to build against official DPDK.org?
- PS: +1
- RLB: Will be able to do this once the build is on the community CI, but=
is there any rush on this now?
- JG: Unknown on the timing
- Will be running vrouter from a container, so would be OK for now
- Would get initial numbers
- But it's an optics thing. People aren't going to like that it's buildin=
g from a fork.
- Also, cleaner and less code to maintain
- SK: Speculation on why things are this way: sanity & regression tes=
ting
- Not yet fully automated, so people have to be told which version to use=
- Until it's automated, will be able to do things the right way
- PS: Not the version, it's the source of the code; it's a fork not the m=
aster
- SK: All part of the same process
- Community repos
- contrail-vnc & contrail-dev-env aren't being used by commercial con=
trail?
- Add TF folks to these repos?
- VMB: Should get these moved to TF space instead
- Can move these w/o disturbing anything else
- PS will check with SK, then follow up with helpdesk@ to get repos moved
- RLB: This is being driven internally by Juniper folks; it's only partly=
an LF responsibility right now
- CI is running for further testing according to Randy
- TPC
- JG: Doh! This meeting actually starts 30 minutes later now
- Need to send updated invite for this (already updated on the calendar)<=
/li>
- Casey sent an updated invitation at 10:30
- JG: common code between kernel and dpdk vrouter can be good and bad
- can kill some of the performance benefits on dpdk vrouter to acheive co=
mmon code
- SK: contrail-vnc and contrail-dev-env is still used internally used by =
Juniper.
- SK: will help with respect to reviews.
- SK: More Architects will be joining the TWS call starting next meeting.=
Action items
- Randy BiasFollow up with Juniper to get someone to review the VSPER=
F config
- Prabhjot Singh Sethi Email dev@ & Sukhdev Kapur to learn more about the contrail-* r=
epos
- Prabhjot Singh Sethi Follow up with Alex about the TPC stuf=
f
- Joseph Gasparakis Write Casey to have him send an updated =
invite for this meeting
- Randy Bias Talk to Car=
lo Contavalli and Marcus about the DPDK build thing (build against=
a tag/release instead of a fork)
- Joseph Gasparakis to start email thread on using vhost in=
terface from dpdk instead of vrouter dpdk on dev mailing list
- Randy Bias need to get us list of code reviewers Juniper and =
non - Juniper
- Sukhdev Kapur to followup with juniper engineering to c=
heck with respect to usage of dpdk from dpdk.org
------=_Part_3340_2079655774.1711653524746--