Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Randy & Will had homework from last call; haven't heard back from them yet
  • Reviewing Darien's answers to the messaging framework doc
    • He'll add this to the wiki in a bit
    • Can't forget to include security in the discussion about service chaining
      • Micro-segmentation super helpful for security
      • Also has analytics for this segmentation
      • Align with SecDevOps
        • Zero trust
        • TF makes it easy
        • Security from Day 1, don't have to add it later
    • Dev perspective: TF is a CNI, so you don't need to change what you're doing
    • LC: WS & Randy were both questioning the "service chain" term last week
      • Too telco-centric and not particularly devops-y?
      • DH: Could be, could call it something else if there were another name for it
      • Instead lead with SecDevOps for TF Networking instead (just uses service chaining behind the scenes)?
        • Lean on app security instead
    • Updating the doc according to the discussion on the call
    • Visibility…of what?
      • Of app health, flow logs, real-time packet analyzer (need to verify works with k8s)
      • LC: Still too networky?
      • DH: Not really; the devops in his company are pretty comfortable with a lot of this stuff
    • CNI: How is TF better than the others?
      • What makes TF better than Calico?
      • Maybe something more like "multi-site connectivity"? Ability to manage instances across multiple platforms/sites/clouds? True freedom of movement or some such.
  • Need most help with documenting the Proof Points
    • What are the cool things that TF does that no one else does?
    • Can bubble things up from there
  • DH will also talk to some of their k8s gurus
    • Work with Calico, Flannel, etc all day
    • Will probably have some good ideas
  • Do we want to meet next week for the next round?
    • Lisa will set up a call for Wednesday

Action items

  •