Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Prabhjot Singh Sethi Sai Pujita T Subramanian M Soujanya R M Edward Ting Herakliusz Lipiec Krzysztof Kajkowski Jared Linley  Subramanian M

Agenda

  • Start the Recording
  • Show the Antitrust Policy
  • Agenda Bashing, Roll Call, Action Items
  • General Topics
    • follow up on onap integration
    • future plans for dpdk support
    • operators for Tungsten Fabric
  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

Topic 1ONAP integration

  • CommentsPSS 

Topic 2

  • PSS - Future plans for dpdk support , not migrating contrail-dpdk upsteam , make sure build happens from dpdk upstream releases Juniper also working in the same direction and may be some collab is possible. Not enough people from Juniper in the call for a detailed discussion.  Put around a process for migration to dpdk latest release.
  • With respect to Tungsten Fabric Operator,  If anyone wants to talk about it ? Unfortunately not enough audience.  Juniper have their own proprietary implementation. We definitely need a tungsten fabric operator implementation. We need to establish a operator structure for tungsten fabric.
    Jared - May be connect with Michael regarding contrail operator.
    PSS - We cannot force Juniper. We do not know whether they want to upstream the project or not. Does it make sense for a collaboration ? That needs to be addressed. But not enough audience from Juniper.  
    Jared - Get back after having conversation with Michael. 
    PSS - Before effort happens, commercial aspect should never be overlooked. Need enough information from Juniper regarding upstreaming of contrail operator. 
  • Collaboration with community can be done with respect to dpdk migration.  ATS do not have commercial interest in vrouter-dpdk. It is just the contribution to community. 
    Jared - They're working actively towards migration. 
    PSS - Open for discussion for a collaborative effort. 

...