This page was created at the request of the TSC to provide a list of areas where the Tungsten Fabric Community needs support.


The community needs to Address the following category of issues.

Repo Migration:

Repo migration to Tungsten Fabric needs to be completed, allowing the community to establish processes and procedures as per LFN guidelines.

This is also one of the important parts for the community to come out of the incubation phase.

The community needs to have a better track of repo move and challenges, which will enable the community to establish better transparency and collaboration

Trade Mark:

Repos have a very large context of references to Juniper's Trademark Contrail, which limits participating community members to do their version of distribution for Tungsten Fabric.

Hence limiting the participation in the Tungsten Fabric community.

This needs to be addressed on an urgent basis or a stop-gap solution needs to be achieved, which will help to attract more community members to participate.

Segregation of private information from technology:

Many of the commits messages in repo have vague comments or references to URLs private to organizations, participating organizations need to ensure segregation of private information from the technology/architecture/gist of the commit made, allow commit message to be complete in itself.

This allows and encourages community members to review and comment on changes if they have any objections.

Discussion of Release planning, Blueprints and feature development:

development of new features have to follow a process and needs to be transparent with other participating members, giving a chance to have a discussion and to be able to arrive at a better, toughened architecture or solution for the feature proposed.

Participating in Community discussions:

All the Active committers are expected to participate in a community discussion on various channels established for the community.

Unblocking pending commits:

Many of the commits were blocked due to non-technical reasons, which have forced submitters to either abandon or take their code changes downstream.


Technical


Organizational