Page History

...

• Start the Recording
• Antitrust Policy
• Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)
• General Topics
  • June DDF - Stockholm
  • Announcement - Our talk was accepted at LFN summit - see here - https://www.linuxfoundation.org/calendar/kubecon-cloudnativecon-europe/

Minutes

• Action item review
  • Will Stevens isn't on to report back
  • Jim St. Leger is listen-only for now; will swing around to him later in the call
  • Sukhdev Kapur in a holding pattern on giving info to pono; asked to hand it over in one big lump so waiting for that
    • Got the ARB list to Brandon for updating the website
    • Edward Ti
• General Topics
  • June DDF - Stockholm
  • Announcement - Our talk was accepted at LFN summit - see here - https://www.linuxfoundation.org/calendar/kubecon-cloudnativecon-europe/

...

• June Developer Design Forum (DDF)
  • Cross-project for all LFN
  • Scheduled for 2nd week of June at Stockholm Convention Center
  • Hoping for 4 days but may only be 3
  • More info on the way ASAP, today or tomorrow
  • VMB: This seems like a new thing?
    • JsL: Yes, many questions; is this our developer event…? We never discussed this?
    • probb: Used to have independent events for projects (plugfests, PTG)
      • Opted to consolidate as cross-project now with LFN
        • Started with ONAP/OPNFV in January & it went well
      • June chosen to line up with current ONAP/OPNFV schedules
      • Use wiki to coordinate topics
  • VMB recommends DDF plans be a standing agenda item
  • SK: Forum would be very useful! But not sure whether we can get people there…?
    • ccain: should try to get as many community members there as possible
• Next DDF plan?
  • Hoping for November-December
    • Also based around OPNFV-ONAP release schedule, which is moving
    • So may actually be in January-February
  • No venue yet
• Talk about the planned architectural changes
  • SK: The stuff Nachi presented many months ago
• LFN Summit acceptance!
  • Yay, Sukhdev Kapur !
• Blueprints to review?
  • JG: Not getting blueprints until after 5.1?
    • ccain: Seems to be the case
  • JG: Good to approve these from the business side in this meeting
    • Handle the architectural details/approval in the technical meeting
  • JG: Approve business side first to save time not covering deep technical details of something we're not going to add to the roadmap?
  • SK: Will this slow down the process? Need to keep the velocity.
    • Aim to have entire approval process done in a week
    • Perhaps parallel rather than serial? Async process?
  • ccain: Define this blueprint process & add to the docs

Action items