...
- Action items
- CC still investigating Groups.io calendaring
- DH ~½ done w/5.1 blog post, will send to some TSC folks today
- RLB still following up w/Juniper folks about NCDC
- CC blocked on schwag until LF store manager returns from holiday
- SK: nsm conversations starting this week
- SK: Release tagging may be a moot point thanks to Prabhjot Singh Sethi's work
- SK: Following up on differences between TF and Contrail 5.1, will email marketing@ & follow up with Darien Hirotsu
- SK: Blueprint process & core committers are on hold pending repo migrations
- VSPERF
- Testing framework in OPNFV, mostly for perf
- Having a conversation about integration vRouter into the VSPerf framework
- VSPerf exposes APIs for working w/any switch, collects stats, cleans up, etc
- Roadblock: Having a separate DPDK
- vRouter doesn't work w/upstream DPDK right now; Would need its own
- Plan for vRouter to support upstream DPDK soon, though
- Will need to discuss in TC, get input from everyone
- Could run vRouter in a container, then use VSPerf to run the tests
- Run tests w/different traffic generators, collect stats
- Probably the best way to get started w/these tests
- SR: Is there a Dockerfile for this already?
- Prabhjot has this, will connect with Sridhar
- Sridhar will run some initial tests & get back to us (email tsc@)
- If this works, we'll get regular perf reports about vRouter (woo!)
- 5.1 Release
- PS has built several versions
- Minor differences in the commits, but nothing too concerning
- Bottom line: community should now be able to do its own build process
- Either pick by hashes to choose the commit or take what we have
- Using third party packages
- Don't know where these are coming from (it's just an IP address) → contrail dev-env
- These aren't version controlled?
- ET: Containers named Contrail or TF?
- Node manager looks at the name of the containers to make sure the services are running
- So the name matters…which ones are used?
- 5.0.3 added feature to add a company name here
- PS: Haven't verified yet
- ET: GUI shows…?
- PS: Build version
- Proceed as is w/the minor differences?
- RLB: What's the delta?
- Only 3 repos w/a lag, each w/1 commit
- contrail-test
- contrail-vrouter
- contrail-common
- PS will send these commits to the email thread
- Will need to agree on daily build for the community
- Need to loop in the Infra team
- RLB: Eventually should be able to complete stuff from Business-level Requirements for TF Release Process
- PS has built several versions
- tf-devstack
- Woo! Just about ready to roll!
- Gotta get this moved to the TF repos
- Will deploy on a single machine
- Option for k8s (10GB) or OpenStack (16GB)
- Can point at 5.1 tags/release
- Options later to point at specific code
- Will be able to announce this soon, super exciting, woo!
- JG: How have the previous problems (quick dependency changes) been solved?
- Progmatic has a copy of the Juniper CI/CD setup in Vexxhost
- This will be the first project running on that
- Will be bumpy at first but committed to supporting it to smooth out the bumps as they come up
- DH has been testing it and can recommend it; very solid so far
- RLB: blog post after? (DH: YES!)
- NCDC Speakers
- Will talk offline
- CLA
- VMB: Need to have all CLA managers on the mailing list
- Also need instructions for the CLA managers
Action items
- VM (Vicky) Brasseur (she/her)Let Alex know that Will Stevenswould like to test the tf-devstack when it's available
- Randy Bias Figure out what/where/how TPC is (Germany IP address)
- Randy Bias DockerHub TF admin access - Carver
- Prabhjot Singh Sethi Will confirm the name used in the 5.1 containers
- Prabhjot Singh Sethi Add 5.1 delta commit hashes to email thread
- Casey Cain Add other CLA managers to the mailing list
- Casey Cain Send instructions for how to admin CLAs