Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Agenda

Minutes

  • Action item review

    ...

      • Convention Center
      • Hoping for 4 days but may only be 3
      • More info on the way ASAP, today or tomorrow
      • VMB: This seems like a new thing?
        • JsL: Yes, many questions; is this our developer event…? We never discussed this?
        • probb: Used to have independent events for projects (plugfests, PTG)
          • Opted to consolidate as cross-project now with LFN
            • Started with ONAP/OPNFV in January & it went well
          • June chosen to line up with current ONAP/OPNFV schedules
          • Use wiki to coordinate topics
      • VMB recommends DDF plans be a standing agenda item
      • SK: Forum would be very useful! But not sure whether we can get people there…?
        • ccain: should try to get as many community members there as possible
    • Next DDF plan?
      • Hoping for November-December
        • Also based around OPNFV-ONAP release schedule, which is moving
        • So may actually be in January-February
      • No venue yet
    • Talk about the planned architectural changes
      • SK: The stuff Nachi presented many months ago
    • LFN Summit acceptance!
    • Blueprints to review?
      • JG: Not getting blueprints until after 5.1?
        • ccain: Seems to be the case
      • JG: Good to approve these from the business side in this meeting
        • Handle the architectural details/approval in the technical meeting
      • JG: Approve business side first to save time not covering deep technical details of something we're not going to add to the roadmap?
      • SK: Will this slow down the process? Need to keep the velocity.
        • Aim to have entire approval process done in a week
        • Perhaps parallel rather than serial? Async process?
      • ccain: Define this blueprint process & add to the docs

    Action items

    •