Date
Attendees
VM (Vicky) Brasseur (she/her) (proxy for Valentin Sinitsyn)
- Randy Bias (proxy for Edward Ting& Sukhdev Kapur)
- Casey Cain
- Daniel Pono Takamori
- Martin Mailand
- Sukhdev Kapur (has to drop off call)
- Abhijeet Singh
- Rudra Dubey
- Will Stevens
- bjskerry
- Ian Rae
Agenda
- Start the Recording
- Antitrust Policy
- Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)
- General Topics
- 2020 Priorities and Budget (will probably take most/all of the meeting)
- Monthly releases: Contrail vs. TF
- DDF at KubeCon NA (see this email)
- Review of newly migrated (from Juniper) TF blueprints in next tech workstream call (Tuesday)
- Could be deferred an additional week (TBD)
Minutes
- DDF at KubeCon NA
- Have space for ~55 people. Do we want to use it?
- RLB: Yes. Lock it in.
- VMB: How much for it?
- CC: Small fee for coffee & stuff, but room is free
- Tungsten Fabric 2019 DDF
- Budgeting process for 2020
- LF finalising this & will talk to TSC about it next week
- Priorities for 2020
- Please review 2019 TSC Priorities
- Build/release process
- Improve ease of use
- Improve governance
- Improve developer diversity
- Don't expect many changes for 2020
- Please review 2019 TSC Priorities
- Talk more about it next week
- FYI: TWS call next week will include blueprint review
- Moved from Juniper Jira to TF Jira (woo!)
- Infra group is changing their meeting frequency
- No need to meet weekly at the moment
- Move to biweekly
- Monthly releases: Contrail vs TF
- Only introducing the subject now; longer conversation needed
- Juniper is releasing Contrail every month now; TF…is not
- Can the TF CI even match what Juniper has right now?
- Hardware requirements
- Manual QA required
- If TF keeps consuming/repackaging Juniper, setting expectation of monthly releases but those releases are tied to Juniper release capabilities that TF can't duplicate
- We need to figure out the best path forward
- VMB: Make this our single goal for 2020: reach parity w/Juniper so TF is consumable
- Draft plan
- Start figuring out the gaps between where we are & where we want to be
- Where are we now?
- Where to we want to be?
- What do we need to work on to get there?
- Use DDF to work on filling in those gaps and/or plan for filling them in 2020
- Start figuring out the gaps between where we are & where we want to be
- swill: Would it make sense to use the CNCF cross-cloud tests?
- VMB: maybe? Dunno what we need, dunno what they do. But if there's overlap then sure.
- Abhijeet: ATT has Tempest tests
- RLB: Want to use these, but current test framework is Heat/python & totally different; wanna get to that
- AS: Useful to open source these tests anyway?
- RLB: Yes, definitely
- AS: Point of contact for testing?
- ATT has build Torpedo, a new project and container testing
- Could have the testing SME & have them fill folks in?
- RLB: reach out to RLB, VMB, Alex
- Next step: RLB talk to alevine & make the gap analysis a priority
- VMB: Documented in the wiki, please
- swill: Published list of passing/failing tests?
- RLB: alevine has it; Zuul
- swill: k8s architectures
- (note taker got pulled onto something else & missed a bunch of this)
- tl;dr: Will's gonna make this into a blueprint.
Action items
- Casey Cain Start a wiki page for planning the KubeCon DDF (topic proposals, etc)
- Randy Bias Ask Progmatic to link to the Zuul on the wiki
- Casey Cain Will get the blueprint review on the agenda for next week's TWS call
- Randy Bias To talk to Alex about a documented GAP analysis of what is missing to achieve parity with Juniper testing by Kubecon NA and the TF DDF there